USA Today editor Hemal Jhaveri said she was fired after "mistakenly" tweeting that the Boulder supermarket shooter was another "angry white man".
Jhaveri later apologized for the tweet and admitted an “error of judgement” but said she was the victim of “alt-right Twitter accounts”.
Who is Hemal Jhaveri, what is her religion and what did she say about the Boulder shootings?
Jhaveri is a former race and inclusion editor at USA Today,
Jhaveri, who is of Indian descent, explained in a Medium post that she was terminated from the publication after her tweet.
In the immediate aftermath of the shooting Hemal Jhaveri tweeted: “It's always and angry white man, always.”
She was writing in response to a tweet from Deadspin writer Emily Julia DiCaro who posted: “Extremely tired of people's lives depending on whether a white man with an AR-15 is having a good day or not.”
The tweet turned out to be inaccurate as police soon identified the Boulder suspect as Syria-born Colorado resident Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa, and Jhaveri soon apologized and deleted her tweet.
What did she write in her Medium post?
In her Medium post, Jhaveri apologized for her tweet and revealed she was fired from USA Today.
"On Monday night, I sent a tweet responding to the fact that mass shooters are most likely to be white men.
"It was a dashed off over-generalization, tweeted after pictures of the shooter being taken into custody surfaced online.
"It was a careless error of judgement, sent at a heated time, that doesn’t represent my commitment to racial equality. I regret sending it. I apologized and deleted the tweet," she wrote.
She went on to say there “was social media outrage, threats and harassment towards me, and by the end of the day” the paper “had relieved me of my position as a Race and Inclusion editor”.
"I wish I were more surprised by it, but I’m not,” she said.
“Some part of me has been waiting for this to happen because I can’t do the work I do and write the columns I write without invoking the ire and anger of alt-right Twitter.
"I had always hoped that when that moment inevitably came, USA TODAY would stand by me and my track record of speaking the truth about systemic racism. That, obviously, did not happen.”
Jhaveri went on to admit that she was "previously disciplined" for her Twitter activity.
"My previous tweets were flagged not for inaccuracy or for political bias, but for publicly naming whiteness as a defining problem,” she said.
What did she accuse USA Today of?
In the March 26 post, Jhaveri alleged that she faced "constant micro-aggressions and outright racist remarks" while working at USA Today.
She alleged the company "never offered public, institutional support" when she experienced fallout from her columns – most recently a piece about Oral Roberts University's anti-LGBTQ policy.
Jhaveri mentioned several instances in which White employees at USA Today were able to keep their jobs despite inappropriate behavior, including the paper's editor-in-chief Nicole Carroll publishing a blackface photo in her college yearbook.
Carroll later apologized
Jhaveri accused USA Today of "trumpeting its commitment to diversity, equality and inclusion" but then contradicting its commitment with its actions.
Gannett, which publishes USA Today and hundreds of local newspapers, like other newsrooms last year, made public commitments to improve the diversity of its newsroom.
Last August, Gannett shared data on gender, racial and ethnic diversity of its newsrooms and created 60 jobs to expand its coverage of inequities in the US.
"We must create environments where all staffers, at all levels, are empowered to speak up, challenge and lead. We need leadership that listens and acts," editor-in-chief Carroll wrote at the time.
"When we fall short, we must own it and address it."
But Jhaveri accused USA Today and its leadership of falling short when it came to supporting her and other diverse voices at the company.
"So many newsrooms claim to value diverse voices, yet when it comes to backing them up, or looking deeper into how white supremacy permeates their own newsrooms, they quickly retreat," Jhaveri wrote.
"Like many places, USA TODAY values 'equality and inclusion,' but only as long as it knows its rightful place, which is subservient to white authority."
Did USA Today respond to Jhaveri's post?
A spokesperson for Gannett told Fox News that the paper was "founded on the basis of diversity, equity and inclusion".
"We hold our employees accountable to these principles both personally and professionally,” said the spokesperson.
"While we can't discuss personnel matters and don't want to comment on the specifics of her statements on Medium, we firmly believe in and stand by our principles of diversity and inclusion."
Source: Read Full Article